Theory behind the bubble pressure method
Theory

Overview

Surface and interfacial tension

Contact angle

Bubble pressure

1. Dynamic surface tension

With conventional surface tension measuring methods, such as the Wilhelmy plate method, the static surface tension is obtained, i.e. a statement about a completely formed surface which is in dynamic equilibrium.

Surfactant solutions require a much longer time than water and other liquids to achieve this dynamic equilibrium. This is because of the molecular construction of the surfactants: they consist of a hydrophilic (water-attracting) “head” and a hydrophobic (water-repelling) “tail”. As a result of this construction the surfactant molecules accumulate at the surface; the “tail” projects from the surface and causes a reduction in the surface tension.

This is shown in the following illustration

Fig. 1
Fig. 1: Orientation of surfactant molecules
Animation
To the left: an animated version
Interfaces are produced extremely quickly in processes such as foaming, cleaning, printing or coating. In such processes it is not just the equilibrium value of the interfacial tension that is the decisive influence, but also the kinetics of the interface formation. The molecular mobility of the surfactants used assumes a considerable influencing factor on the formation of the surface tension.

The following illustration is a schematic representation of the surface tension s of two surfactant solutions as a function of the surface age. As can be seen, at the start the surface tension falls rapidly and only approaches an equilibrium value after some time has passed.

Fig. 2
Fig.2: Time dependence of the dynamic surface tension
2. Dependency of the surface tension on the concentration

In addition to the chemical structure, the concentration also has a decisive influence on the surface tension. The equilibrium value of the surface tension decreases as the number of surfactant molecules accumulating at the surface increases. It achieves its final value when the surface is completely occupied and offers no place for further molecules. If the concentration is further increased from this point then the surfactant molecules will accumulate within the solution and form aggregates, the so-called “micelles”.

Fig. 3
Fig.3: Schematic image of a micelle
The concentration at which this effect occurs is known as the “critical micelle formation concentration” (CMC). It is an important characteristic for surfactants.

This means that methods for measuring the dynamic surface tensions should only be used above the CMC. In such a case the concentration only influences the chronological function of the surface tension and no longer has any influence on its static value. The following illustration shows the measuring ranges of static and dynamic methods (e.g. the bubble pressure method):

Fig. 4
Fig.4: Ranges of static and dynamic measuring methods
3. 3 The bubble pressure method

An easy-to-use method for determining the dynamic surface tension is the method of measuring the maximum bubble pressure.

In a bubble pressure tensiometer gas bubbles are produced in the sample liquid at an exactly defined bubble generation rate. The gas bubbles enter the liquid through a capillary whose radius is known. During this process the pressure passes through a maximum whose value is recorded by the instrument.
The following illustration shows the pressure curve during bubble formation plotted as a function of time:

Fig. 5
1: The bubble is formed. Initially the pressure is below the maximum pressure; the radius of curvature of the air bubble is larger than the radius of the capillary.

2: The pressure curve passes through a maximum. At this point the air bubble radius is the same as that of the capillary; the air bubble forms an exact hemisphere. The following relationship exists between the maximum pressure rmax, the hydro-static pressure in the capillary p0, the inner radius r of the capillary and the surface tension:

( rmax - r0 ) r
s
=
2
3: After the maximum the “dead time” of the measurement starts. The pressure decreases again, the radius of the air bubble becomes larger.

4: The bubble finally escapes from the capillary and rises. The cycle begins again with the formation of the next bubble.

Animation
Two animations to show how this method works.
Animation

4. 4 Diffusion and adsorption coefficients

In reality the surface of a liquid is not a distinct separation line, but rather a thin layer. Within this layer, which is only a few molecules thick, the properties of the solution such as density or concentration are not homogeneous, but depend on the height position within the layer. The surfactant concentration increases as the proximity to the gas phase increases.
In order to be able to describe surface processes mathematically, Gibbs defined an interface boundary without any height. If this model line is placed at the level of the highest surfactant concentration then the inhomogeneous region below the line can be called the “subsurface”. This model allows the thermodynamic differentiation of two processes: diffusion and adsorption. Diffusion describes the molecular movements from the homogeneous solution to the subsurface, adsorption the movement from the subsurface to the surface. These processes take place at different rates; these rates influence the total rate of the reduction in surface tension.
The total rate of the alteration in surface tension can, depending on surface age, concentration, molecular and solvent characteristics, be influenced more strongly by the diffusion rate or more strongly by the adsorption rate. The slower of the two processes dominates the total rate; this is the so-called “rate determining step”.

The diffusion and adsorption coefficients are important quantities for the movement rates during surface formation; these quantities are independent of the concentration and the temperature of the surfactant solution and can therefore be regarded as being characteristics of a surfactant-solvent system.
In order to calculate the two coefficients, measuring curves of the surface tension as a function of surface age are evaluated at various surfactant concentrations. These evaluations are based on the models of Joos & Rillaerts for the diffusions coefficient and Ward & Tordai for the adsorption coefficient.

1.1 Diffusion coefficient according to Joos and Rillaerts

According to Joos and Rillaerts, in the region of the diffusion-related reduction of the surface tension the following relationship applies:

(
D S t
) 0,5

g t = g o - 2 RTc

=

P
where:

g t = surface tension at surface age t
g o = surface tension of pure solvent
R = universal gas constant
T = absolute temperature
c = surfactant concentration
D = diffusion coefficient

In the evaluation in LabDesk the value Ds is calculated for each individual measured value of a curve and plotted against 1/c2 t aufgetragen.

In this way the concentration is used as a standard, i.e. the measuring curves for different concentrations overlap, at least in the low concentration range. One region of the measuring curves should form a plateau, and the required diffusion coefficient is obtained from this plateau value for Ds or from the mean value for the plateaux at different concentrations.
The rate in the higher concentration and surface age range is no longer determined by diffusion; accordingly the value for Ds shows no plateau here.


1.2 Adsorption coefficient according to Ward and Tordai

As concentration increases and at older surface ages the movement toward the surface is no longer determined by diffusion, but the movement of the molecules from the subsurface to the surface (adsorption) is decisive for the history of the surface tension. According to Ward & Tordai the following relationship applies to this region:

RT G 2
(
D l t
) 0,5

g t = g eq +



2
P
where:

g t = surface tension at surface age t
g eq = surface tension in dynamic equilibrium
R = universal gas constant
T = absolute temperature
G =excess concentration
c = surfactant concentration
Dl = adsorption coefficient


As with the diffusion coefficient, when the concentration is used as the standard (plotted against 1/c2 t ) the measuring curves whose plateaux are to be evaluated agree to a large extent. The excess concentration G describes the difference between the amount of substance adsorbed at the surface and the concentration of the substance in the solution. This quantity cannot be accessed directly in a bubble pressure measurement, but must be determined by making CMC measurements. These can be carried out using a KRÜSS Tensiometer and the CMC Add-in of the LabDesk tensiometer software.


KRÜSS GmbH * Borsteler Chaussee 85-99a * 22453 Hamburg * Germany *
Tel: +49-(0)40- 51 44 01-0 * Fax: +49-(0)40-51 44 01-98 * email:

home
Imprint General Terms and Conditions